Tears of the Sun Illuminates, Then Plunges Into Darkness

By Teddy Durgin

tedfilm@aol.com

This is gonna be a tricky review for me, folks, because I think Tears of the Sun is a good and noble film. However, I also found it to be a maddeningly flawed film, too, as well as a mis-marketed one.

First, what is good and noble. Directed by Antoine Fuqua of Training Day fame, Tears of the Sun follows Navy SEAL Lt. A.K. Waters (Bruce Willis) and his elite team of soldiers as they attempt to extract the beautiful physician, Dr. Lena Kendricks (Monica Bellucci), from war-torn Nigeria. The story is fictional, but the film feels immediate, relevant, and harrowing.

Kendricks, an American by marriage, is found tending to the victims of the ongoing civil war in Nigeria, and she refuses to go with Waters and his men unless they also take her patients--at least the ones who can still walk. To placate her, Waters agrees but secretly plans to just take the good doctor back once they reach the helicopter landing zone several miles of jungle away. Waters, though, has a dramatic change of heart when during the ensuing flyover, he witnesses the horribly destroyed village from which they just escaped. He and his men go back for the frightened, brutalized refugees they left behind and soon finds themselves trapped behind enemy lines with no military support.

Tears of the Sun dramatizes the plight of a country torn apart by violence and tyranny. It doesn't matter that the story isn't real. History has proven time and again that such stories have occurred, and they will continue to occur as long as the very strong can dominate the very weak. The movie is more about following your conscience, using power wisely, and the value of human life than raging gun battles and lighting up foreign countrysides. I commend Fuqua for taking the more serious route. His goal is to make a film about characters, dilemmas, about survival.

Unfortunately, he falls short by not actually giving us any characters. Bruce Willis does a fine job as Waters, but he is so darn impenetrable at times that we don't know exactly why he is disobeying every--and I mean, EVERY--order his commanding officer, Captain Bill Rhodes (Tom Skerritt), back at base is giving him via radio. Why is this time SO different for him than all of the other times he has performed this same duty? Is it because the doctor is so hot? Is it because he feels responsibility for leaving behind a hospital full of wounded refugees just to be slaughtered by the approaching rebels?

Or is it because the movie needed a plot?

The only other personality in the picture that makes a lasting impression is Bellucci's Kendricks. The Malena star is almost too beautiful for this kind of down-and-dirty film. But her performance is strong and forceful, and you can't take your eyes off her. Why Fuqua had her running around and tending to the outcast with her cleavage hanging out, I'll never know.

Everyone else, as they say in military terms, is expendable. I was shocked by how little screen time the rest of the SEALs got to develop anything resembling real characters. If you see this film, I defy you to remember three of the names in Waters' team. The film has the annoying habit of having several of them come to the lieutenant and engaging him in this conversation:

SOLDIER: L.T., I don't think we should be doing this. WILLIS: What should we doing? Abandoning these people? SOLDIER: Yeah, but disobeying orders? I don't know. WILLIS: Are you in or are you out? SOLDIER: Hey, I'm in.

And they fall back in line! I'm all for discipline, but I'm also all for compelling drama. This scene plays out at least three different times in the film.

Two more flaws, and then I will have a few choice words for the knuckleheads who are completely misrepresenting the movie in ads and trailers. One, if you want an audience to have sympathy for a persecuted population, don't just show us atrocity after atrocity. Give us characters! Fuqua shows plenty of innocent, unarmed people being shot by hulking rebel soldiers. He gives us probably a hundred close-ups of scared, crying, hopeless Nigerian faces. But only a handful of the refugees--the very people the audience MUST feel for in order for the movie to work--have any speaking parts whatsoever. And then it's just to say, "Thank you, dear doctor! Thank you, dear soldier! You have done the right ting."

And, two, if you want to really dramatize such plight, why make half the movie about soldiers escorting refugees at tiptoe speed miles and miles through a darkened jungle? Seriously, I could see the other audience members in the theater better than I could see the characters in half of this movie. We get an eye here, a footstep there, and the pace is maddening. In this part of the movie, he needed to establish the individual personalities. Look at a movie like Platoon or, heck, even a cheeseball action flick like Predator, and the team of featured soldiers has AT LEAST six to eight very distinct and very strong personalities to identify with.

Finally, and I'll stop here, this is not the wall-to-wall action film that the commercials would have you believe. It's just not. Fuqua didn't make that film, and again I commend him for that. I would estimate 90 percent of the fireworks and gunplay you see in the ads now running happens in the FINAL 15 minutes of this movie. There are great, GREAT fireworks. Fuqua gives us a final sprint for life by soldiers and civilians alike that is as intense, scary, and ultimately heartbreaking as anything in last year's We Were Soldiers. But this is not a war movie, but a mission movie.

I don't know. Maybe I would have liked Tears of the Sun better had I known going in what the film was going to be like. Again, I reiterate how much I admire Fuqua for opting to make a movie where he didn't put the action sequences first and the ideas second. His goal was to make me feel. And on that level, he failed me.

But he did make me ponder the often-brutal world in which I live. Tears of the Sun ends with the great Edmund Burke quote: "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Read into that what you will, my friends.

Tears of the Sun is rated R for violence, brutality, and language.


In-depth reviews: [Flix] [Capsule Reviews] [Showtimes & Locations]

[Home]